Overview of MW98: Why you should attend MW98 Learn new skills to enhance your museum site Explore issues and controversies facing Museums and the Web Experts featured at MW98 Commercial products and services to enhance your web site Organizations supporting MW98: Online interchange regarding the virtual museum experience Juried awards to best web sites in 5 categories Overview of MW98: Why you should attend MW98 Learn new skills to enhance your museum site Explore issues and controversies facing Museums and the Web Experts featured at MW98 Commercial products and services to enhance your web site Organizations supporting MW98: Online interchange regarding the virtual museum experience Juried awards to best web sites in 5 categories
MUSEUMS AND THE WEB 1998

Overview of MW98: Why you should attend MW98 Learn new skills to enhance your museum site Explore issues and controversies facing Museums and the Web Experts featured at MW98 Commercial products and services to enhance your web site Organizations supporting MW98: Online interchange regarding the virtual museum experience Juried awards to best web sites in 5 categories

Archives & Museum Informatics

info @ archimuse.com

www.archimuse.comArchives and Museum Informatics Home Page

published April 1998
updated Nov. 2010

Papers

Web Graphics: Art on the Net

Mark Harden, texas.net Museum of Art

Effective online display of art images

The most important issue in the online presentation of art images is the tradeoff between sufficiently detailed images and limitations of browser screen "real estate". For most low-end systems, running at a resolution of 640 x 480 pixels, a screen-sized image just does not provide sufficient detail to do any justice to the painting. Navigational elements can further reduce available screen "real estate", accentuating the problem.

The standard design solution is to provide thumbnail images which link to a larger, full-sized image. The Artchive uses this approach. Note that the online version of the site does not automatically display the thumbnails, which for some artists with one hundred or more images, would be a download of more than 500kb. Instead, the visitor is given the option of viewing all of the thumbnails. The thumbnail image is effective at providing a point of reference for the viewer when later confronted with the full-sized image, which must be scrolled in order to be completely studied.

In scanning images, I have evolved an approach of providing separate detail images in lieu of a single large scan. Thus, the visitor can view the thumbnail, the entire image at close to screen size, and finally a more detailed depiction of a portion of the entire image. This means of moving from the microcosmic to the macrocosmic provides an enriched viewing experience of the work of art.

The framed interface of the Artchive sacrifices screen real estate for serendipity. Often visitors enter the site directly into a specific artist's section; I want the lengthy listing of names to indicate to them that there are images from another two hundred or so artists to explore. Some of the most rewarding feedback comes from visitors expressing their appreciation for having been introduced to an artist they had never heard of before.

The Artchive is in serious need of enhancement as far as exhibition of images. For one thing, JavaScript code could provide a means of displaying the images by themselves in a new browser window, thereby maximizing screen real estate. The raw size of the Artchive, more than two thousand scans, makes coding this sort of update a time constrained effort. For now, I have offered visitors a number of viewing tips to help make the most of their screen real estate.

Next: Speaking of time...

Return to Table of Contents


Last modified: March 16, 1998. This file can be found below http://www.archimuse.com/mw98/
Send questions and comments to info@archimuse.com